Senderov, Viktor; Simov, Kiril. "OpenBiodiv Ontology and Guide," n.d.https://github.com/pensoft/OpenBiodiv/blob/master/ontology/openbiodiv-ontology.Rmd.
OpenBiodiv expands to "Open Biodiversity Knowledge Management System" and has previously been referred to as OBKMS.
This document is the guide to the OpenBiodiv ontology (OpenBiodiv-O) and the ontology at the same time [as a literate programming] (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Literate_programming) document. This means that we include the source code within its documentation.
Previous versions relied on the program noweb
. We have now switched to the R libraryknitr
for building the document from Rmarkdown. Since there is no Turtle engine forknitr
, we markup the code-chunks as R, but do not execute them.
The R knitr
command to create the Turtle file with the ontology from this document is:
knit(input = "openbiodiv-ontology.Rmd", tangle = TRUE, output = "openbiodiv-ontology.ttl")
It obtains the ontology in its Turtle serialization.
The present work introduces OpenBiodiv Ontology, which serves as the basis of the OpenBiodiv knowledge system. By providing an ontology focusing on taxonomy, our intent is to provide an ontology that fills in the gaps between ontologies for biodiversity resources such as Darwin-SW and semantic publishing ontologies such as SPAR. Moreover, we take the view that is advantageous to model the taxonomic process itself, and not any particular state of knowledge.
A lot of research has gone into ontologies, knowledge bases in general and into biodiversity knowledge representation in particular. This gives us a vast amount of publications, ontologies, vocabularies, and datasets to draw from while implementing our model and database. In this section we list these sources of inspiration.
Obitko (2007) defines an ontology as aSpecification of Conceptualization
Guarino et al. (2009) define an ontology aGa shared formal, explicit specification of a conceptualization. This article goes into set-theoretic details of what is conceptualization and formalisms are in order to properly write down a conceptualization in a mathematical form.
A very important data model that we are drawing from is the [Semantic Publishing and Referencing Ontologies][http://http://www.sparontologies.net/ontologies/] by Peroni (2014). We use it to model scientific articles, their structure, and related entities. As part of SPAR we use individual ontologies such asFaBiO,DOCO and so on.
Another very important data model that we drawing from is theDarwin-SWby Baskauf and Web (2014).
Furthermore we use the Darwin Core RDF Guide.
For modeling scientific names we draw inspiration from NOMENand theTaxonomic Nomenclatural Status Terms.
A specific part of a taxonomic manuscript called"treatment" is modeled by Plazi.
An attempt to model taxon concepts has previously been made in theTaxon Concept Ontology.
Open Biodiversity Knowledge Management System is a PhD project by Viktor Senderov. Rod Pagehas also published an articleon the same topic.
It is an attempt to modelTaxonomic and Biodiversity Information for Computers.
Names ultimately have a limited use in informatics, also challenges. Original research in this work models them names and their relationships
It modelspotential taxaas taxon concepts. Taxon concepts are also treated inTwo Influential Primate Classifications Aligned andthe phylogentic revision of the genusMinyomerusby Franz et. al (2015, 2016).
Taxon concepts can have both an intensional meaning and a class extension. Some examples come fromFrom Cladograms to Classificationsby Platnick (2001).
The Codes of Zoological andBotanical Nomenclature ought also to be mentioned as a source of albeit too granular in some cases inspiration for the data models.
Our ontology strives be a formal specification of a conceptualization. In our mental model we have some concepts of some things. When we talk about these concepts in the abstract, we will make use of Capitalization. For example let's suppose we want to name the top-level concept, i.e. the concept which encompasses all concepts. For this we write Thing. In another example, let's suppose we want to name a part of a manuscript where taxonomic circumscription takes place. We say Treatment when we refer to that concept. We also have concepts for relations (in our conceptualization only binary relations are allowed). To denote these relations in the abstract we use verbal phrases and we might or might not use quotes (we will use quotes only if it adds to the clarity of exposition). For example, Treatment is a Thing as opposed to Treatment "is a" Thing. We also have individual instances of these concepts. To refer to those we might use improper or proper nouns or phrases wherever appropriate. For example, "the treatment on page 5," or "a treatment," or "John."
When we formally define a concept in OWL and issue an URI to it, we shall refer to the URI, as we refer to all URI's in the text with typewriter font
. URI's of classes and vocabularies will be inMajorCamelCase
. URI's of relationships will be in minorCamelCase
. URI's of individualswill-be- hyphenated
. This seems to generally in accordance with WWW practice.
Also we strive for human-readable identifiers even if some ontology building practices argue against it.
Note: As SPAR (and FaBiO in particular) serve as somewhat of a top-levelontology for us, we use the skos
prefix as they use it.
@prefix : <http://openbiodiv.net/> . @prefix skos: <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#> . @prefix rdf: <http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#> . @prefix rdfs: <http://www.w3.org/2000/01/rdf-schema#> . @prefix foaf: <http://xmlns.com/foaf/0.1/> . @prefix pro: <http://purl.org/spar/pro/> . @prefix scoro: <http://purl.org/spar/scoro/> . @prefix ti: <http://www.ontologydesignpatterns.org/cp/owl/timeinterval.owl#> . @prefix tvc: <http://www.essepuntato.it/2012/04/tvc/> . @prefix xsd: <http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#> . @prefix fabio: <http://purl.org/spar/fabio/> . @prefix dcelements: <http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/> . @prefix dcterms: <http://purl.org/dc/terms/> . @prefix frbr: <http://purl.org/vocab/frbr/core#> . @prefix prism: <http://prismstandard.org/namespaces/basic/2.0/> . @prefix doco: <http://purl.org/spar/doco/> . @prefix po: <http://www.essepuntato.it/2008/12/pattern#> . @prefix co: <http://purl.org/co/> . @prefix trt: <http://plazi.org/treatment#> . @prefix c4o: <http://purl.org/spar/c4o/> . @prefix dwciri: <http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/iri/> . @prefix nomen: <http://www.semanticweb.org/dmitriev/ontologies/2013/8/untitled-ontology-6#> . @prefix dwc: <http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/> . @prefix sro: <http://salt.semanticauthoring.org/ontologies/sro#> . @prefix deo: <http://purl.org/spar/deo/> . @prefix pext: <http://proton.semanticweb.org/protonue#> . @prefix ptop: <http://proton.semanticweb.org/protont#> . @prefix pkm: <http://proton.semanticweb.org/protonkm#> . @prefix vcard: <http://www.w3.org/2006/vcard/ns#> . @prefix dbr: <http://dbpedia.org/resource/> . @prefix org: <http://www.w3.org/ns/org#> . @prefix owl: <http://www.w3.org/2002/07/owl#> . @prefix lucene: <http://www.ontotext.com/connectors/lucene#> . @prefix inst: <http://www.ontotext.com/connectors/lucene/instance#> . @prefix dbo: <http://dbpedia.org/ontology/> . @prefix vs: <http://www.w3.org/2003/06/sw-vocab-status/ns#> . @prefix dwcattributesns: <http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/attributes/> .
:openbiodiv-ontology rdf:type owl:Ontology ; owl:versionInfo "1.0" ; rdfs:comment "You are free to create derivative work as long as you cite the original authors." ; dcelements:title "The Open Biodiversity Knowledge Management System Ontology" ; dcelements:subject "Biodiversity Informatics" ; rdfs:label "OpenBiodiv Ontology" ; dcelements:creator "Viktor Senderov, Kiril Simov" ; dcelements:license "CC-BY license version 4.0" ; owl:imports <http://purl.org/spar/fabio/> .
We incorporate several external ontologies fully into our data model. Some of them via a direct web import. Where it is not possible due to an error, we import them as text files found under imported_ontologies
. They may contain small bug-fixes to overcome the error.
We also borrow parts from external ontologies (contributed parts). Those are attributed in the text.
The publishing domain is described in our model using the Semantic Publishing and Referencing Ontologies, a.k.a.SPAR Ontologies. We do import several of these ontologies (please consult the paragraph"Imports and Contributions"). Refer to the documentation on the SPAR Ontologies' site for an exhaustive treatment.
In the rest of this section we describe the modeling of entities in the publishing domain that are not found in the SPAR ontologies. The central new class in OpenBiodiv not found in SPAR is the:Treatment
class, borrowed from the Treatment Ontologies.
po:contains rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ; owl:inverseOf po:isContainedBy ; rdfs:domain po:Structured ; rdfs:comment "A structured element contains another generic element."@en ; rdfs:label "contains"@en .
po:isContainedBy rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:comment "An element that is contained by another structured element."@en ; rdfs:label "is contained by"@en .
po:Structured rdf:type owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf po:Pattern ; rdfs:comment "The class of elements that can contain other elements."@en ; rdfs:label "structured element"@en .
po:Pattern rdf:type owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf owl:Thing ; rdfs:comment "A structural pattern is an atomic component of a document, that is able to capture a recurrent and well known structure of a document. Any entity belonging to this class is compliant with exactly one structural pattern."@en ; rdfs:label "pattern-based element"@en .
:Mention rdf:type owl:Class ; rdfs:seeAlso pext:Mention ; rdfs:subClassOf deo:DiscourseElement ; rdfs:comment "An area of a document that can be considered a mention of something."@en ; rdfs:label "Mention" .
ptop:Statement rdf:type owl:Class ; rdfs:comment "A message that is stated or declared; a communication (oral or written), setting forth particulars or facts, etc; \"according to his statement he was in London on that day\". WordNet 1.7.1"@en ; rdfs:label "Statement"@en .
foaf:Agent rdf:type owl:Class ; rdfs:comment "An agent (eg. person, group, software or physical artifact)." ; rdfs:label "Agent" ; vs:term_status "stable" .
:mentions rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:comment "A direct link between an information resource, like a document or a section and an entity." ; rdfs:domain :Mention ; rdfs:label "mentions" .
contains
is a sub-property of po:contains
that is transitive property.
:contains rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty, owl:TransitiveProperty ; rdfs:label "OpenBiodiv contains" ; rdfs:subPropertyOf po:contains. :isContainedBy rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty, owl:TransitiveProperty ; rdfs:label "OpenBiodiv is contained by" ; rdfs:subPropertyOf po:isContainedBy.
We have mentioned before that when we extract bibliographic elements from the XML, we make use of thepo:contains
SPAR property. For example, an article canpo:contain
a secion and this section can po:contain
another (sub-)section. In our view, this means that also the article contains the (sub-)section. Therefore we define po:contains
as a transitive property.
The publisher of a journal, a type of foaf:Agent
.
:Publisher rdf:type owl:Class ; rdfs:label "Publisher"@en ; rdfs:comment "The publisher of a journal, a type of `foaf:Agent`."@en ; rdfs:subClassOf foaf:Agent .
:TaxonomicArticle
is a specialized journal article for publishing taxonomic findings.
:TaxonomicArticle rdf:type owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf fabio:JournalArticle ; rdfs:label "Taxonomic Article"@en .
See Plazi for a theoretical discussion of Treatment.
A treatment is a rhetorical element of a taxonomic article. Thus, Treatment is defined akin to Introduction, Methods, etc. fromDEO, The Discourse Elements Ontology.
:Treatment a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf deo:DiscourseElement , [ rdf:type owl:Restriction ; owl:onProperty :isContainedBy ; owl:someValuesFrom :TaxonomicArticle ] ; rdfs:label "Taxonomic Treatment"@en ; rdfs:comment "A rhetorical element of a taxonomic publication, where taxon circumscription takes place."@en ; rdfs:comment "Таксономично пояснение или само Пояснение е риторчна част от таксономичната статия, където се случва описанието на дадена таксономична концепция."@bg .
A taxonomic nomenclature section, or simply a nomenclature, is a rhetorical element of a taxonomic publication where nomenclatural acts are published and nomenclatural statements are made. Nomenclature is a subsection of Treatment.
:NomenclatureSection a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf deo:DiscourseElement, [ rdf:type owl:Restriction ; owl:onProperty :isContainedBy ; owl:someValuesFrom :Treatment ] ; rdfs:label "Nomenclature Section"@en ; rdfs:comment "A section of a taxonomic treatment, containing the scientific name of the taxon described by the treatment, and citations to previous descriptions, designations of type-genus, and type-species, and other information."@en .
Inside the taxonomic nomenclature section, we have the treatment title.
:NomenclatureHeading a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf deo:DiscourseElement , [ rdf:type owl:Restriction ; owl:onProperty :isContainedBy ; owl:someValuesFrom :NomenclatureSection ] ; rdfs:label "Nomenclature Heading"@en ; rdfs:comment "Inside the taxonomic nomenclature section, we have the treatment title (name of the taxon)."@en .
Inside the taxonomic nomenclature section, we have a list of citations.
:NomenclatureCitationsList a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf deo:DiscourseElement , [ rdf:type owl:Restriction ; owl:onProperty :isContainedBy ; owl:someValuesFrom :NomenclatureSection ] ; rdfs:label "Nomenclature Citations List"@en ; rdfs:comment "A section in a treatment that includes the citation of one or several previous treatments of the taxon."@en .
Subsection of treatment.
:BiologySection a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf deo:DiscourseElement, [ rdf:type owl:Restriction ; owl:onProperty :isContainedBy ; owl:someValuesFrom :Treatment ] ; rdfs:label "Biology Section"@en .
Subsection of treatment.
:DescriptionSection a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf deo:DiscourseElement, [ rdf:type owl:Restriction ; owl:onProperty :isContainedBy ; owl:someValuesFrom :Treatment ] ; rdfs:label "Description Section"@en .
Subsection of treatment.
:DiagnosisSection a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf deo:DiscourseElement, [ rdf:type owl:Restriction ; owl:onProperty :isContainedBy ; owl:someValuesFrom :Treatment ] ; rdfs:label "Diagnosis Section"@en .
Subsection of treatment.
:DistributionSection a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf deo:DiscourseElement, [ rdf:type owl:Restriction; owl:onProperty :isContainedBy; owl:someValuesFrom :Treatment ]; rdfs:label "Distribution Section"@en.
Subsection of treatment.
:EtymologySection a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf deo:DiscourseElement, [ rdf:type owl:Restriction ; owl:onProperty :isContainedBy ; owl:someValuesFrom :Treatment ] ; rdfs:label "Etymology Section"@en .
Subsection of treatment.
:TaxonomicKey a owl:Class; rdfs:subClassOf deo:DiscourseElement, [ rdf:type owl:Restriction; owl:onProperty :isContainedBy; owl:someValuesFrom :TaxonomicArticle ]; rdfs:label "Taxonomic Key"@en.
Subsection of treatment.
:MaterialsExamined a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf deo:DiscourseElement , [ rdf:type owl:Restriction ; owl:onProperty :isContainedBy ; owl:someValuesFrom :Treatment ] ; rdfs:label "Materials Examined"@en .
A section in a taxonomic article.
:TaxonomicChecklist a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf deo:DiscourseElement , [ rdf:type owl:Restriction ; owl:onProperty :isContainedBy ; owl:someValuesFrom :TaxonomicArticle ] ; rdfs:label "Taxonomic Checklist"@en ; rdfs:comment "A section in a taxonomic article."@en.
In the text of taxonomic articles we find strings like "Heser stoeviDeltschev, sp. n.". In our conceptualization these are called taxonomic name usages (TNU's) as they refer to published scientific names from the domain of biological systematics. The taxonomic name usage consists of three parts:
Taxonomic name: one or more words identifying the taxon (a purported evolutionary entity in nature). These can be Latinized or take the form of an identifier.
Taxonomic name author. The name-and-year of the author(s) of the taxonomic name.
Taxonomic name status containing information about the type of the taxonomic name usage.
In the example, "Heser stoevi" is the binomial Latinized species name, "Deltschev" is the name of the person who newly coined the name describing the taxon , and "sp. n." bears taxonomic (and nomenclatural) information indicating that this is a species new to science.
Modeling-wise, we consider TNU's to be specialized instances of pext:Mention
from the PROTON Extensions module. Furthermore, we link the TNU's to the scientific name they are symbolizing viapkm:mentions
.
A taxonomic name usage is the mentioning of a taxon name or a taxon concept label (see later) in a text, together with possibly an taxonomic status.
:TaxonomicNameUsage rdf:type owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf :Mention ; rdfs:comment "A taxonomic name usage is the mentioning of a taxonomic name (scientific name, taxonomic concept label, etc.), optionally with a taxonomic status."@en ; rdfs:label "Taxonomic Name Usage"@en .
dwciri:taxonomicStatus rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:label "taxonomic status"@en ; rdfs:comment "the IRI version of the DwC term taxonomic status"@en .
In the logic of our algorithms, it is very important that TNU's are dated with dcelements:date
.
In OpenBiodiv, we reify biological names.
In our conceptualization, taxa in nature are things (referents) that are refered to by our thoughts, theories and concepts (references) that are labeled or symbolized by by biological names (semiotic triangle).
Biological names play a dual role, however, in our system as they are also concepts, i.e. references of taxonomic name usages. A biological name may symbolize more than one taxon concept. It is useful to think of biological names then as taxon concept lineages. More about taxon concepts later.
Biological names have been modeled elsewhere such as for example inNOMEN. However, NOMEN takes the approach of using non-human-readable identifiers and only relying on labels to identify classes of taxonomic names, which does not fit our workflow. For example, the identifier for the class "biological name" is NOMEN_0000030
. In our workflow both RDF generation and debugging would be severely hampered by this convention. Therefore, OpenBiodiv names use human-readable identifiers.
:TaxonomicName rdf:type owl:Class ; skos:prefLabel "Taxonomic Name"@en ; skos:altLabel "Biological Name"@en ; owl:equivalentClass nomen:NOMEN_0000030 .
:ScientificName rdf:type owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf :TaxonomicName ; rdfs:label "Scientific Name"@en ; owl:equivalentClass nomen:NOMEN_0000036 .
:LatinName rdf:type owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf :ScientificName ; skos:prefLabel "Latinized Scientific Name"@en ; skos:altLabel "Linnaean Name"@en .
We further introduce the class of taxonomic concept labels, unknown to NOMEN that is a biological name plus a reference to its description, i.e. it is the label of taxonomic concept. A taxonomic concept label is a taxonomic name usage accompanied by an additional part, consisting of "sec." + an identifier or a literature reference of a work containing the expression of a taxonomic concept (for example a treatment).*
:TaxonomicConceptLabel rdf:type owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf :LatinName ; rdfs:label "Taxon Concept Label"@en ; rdfs:comment "A taxon concept label is a taxonomic name usage accompanied by an additional part, consisting of 'sec.' + an identifier or a literature reference of a work containing the expression of a taxon concept (treatment)."@en .
:OTU_Id rdf:type owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf :ScientificName ; rdfs:label "Operational Taxonomic Unit Identifier"@en ; rdfs:comment "The identifier of an Operational Taxonomic Unit, such as BOLD BIN or a Unite SH ID"@en .
:VernacularName a owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf :TaxonomicName ; rdfs:label "Vernacular Name"@en ; owl:equivalentClass nomen:NOMEN_0000037 .
We do not model scientific names down to the level of the Codes as NOMEN does. For example we do not make a distinction between a zoological and a botanical name. Nothing prevents us, however, from creating derived classes later on. This means that our model is somewhat less granular but compatible with NOMEN.
For properties of biological names we take a different path from NOMEN. We also use different sets of properties to define relationships between biological names and for their data properties.
For data properties we use DwC terms.
To connect different biological objects such as taxon concepts or occurrences to a scientific name we use:scientificName
, which is derived fromdwciri:scientificName
. Even thoughdwciri:scientificName
is defined in spirit inhttp://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/guides/rdf/index.htm#2.5_Terms_in_the_dwciri:_namespace,
To the best of our knowledge, no formal definition of dwciri:scientificName
exists in RDF. Therefore, it has been introduced it here together with a super-property to refer to a more broader class of names.
Contributed property from DwC-IRI.
dwciri:nameAccordingTo rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:label "name according to"@en ; rdfs:comment "the IRI version of dwc:nameAccordingTo"@en .
:nameAccordingTo rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:subPropertyOf dwciri:nameAccordingTo ; skos:prefLabel "OpenBiodiv name according to"@en ; skos:altLabel "sensu"@en ; rdfs:range frbr:Expression ; rdfs:domain :TaxonomicConceptLabel ; rdfs:comment "The reference to the source in which the specific taxonomic concept circumscription is defined or implied - traditionally signified by the Latin 'sensu' or 'sec.'' (from secundum, meaning 'according to'). For taxa that are relevantly circumscribed by identifications, a reference to the keys, monographs, experts and other sources should be given. Should only be used with IRI's"@en .
For relationships between names we introduce two types of relationships: unidirectional and bidirectional.
is an object property that we use in order to indicate that two biological names are related somehow. This relationship is purposefully vague as to encompass all situations where two biological names co-occur in a text. It is transitive and reflexive.*
:relatedName rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty, owl:TransitiveProperty, owl:ReflexiveProperty ; rdfs:label "has related name"@en ; rdfs:domain :TaxonomicName ; rdfs:range :TaxonomicName ; rdfs:comment "'has related name' is an object property that we use in order to indicate that two taxonomic names are related somehow. This relationship is purposely vague as to encompass all situations where two taxonomic names co-occur in a text. It is transitive and reflexive."@en.
This is a uni-directional property. Its meaning is that one one biological name links to a different biological name via the usage of this property, then the object of the triple is the form of the biological name the use of which is more accurate and should be preferred given the information that system currently holds. This property is only defined for scientific names.*
:replacementName rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty , owl:TransitiveProperty ; rdfs:label "has replacement name"@en ; rdfs:domain :LatinName ; rdfs:range :LatinName ; rdfs:comment "This is a uni-directional property. Its meaning is that one Linnaean name links to a different Linnaean name via the usage of this property, then the object name is more accurate and should be preferred given the information that system currently holds. This property is only defined for Linnaean names."@en.
Our view of taxon concepts is based on Berendsohn (1995) and Franz et al (2008).
We consider any given taxon concept to be a scientific theory (concept) about a class of biological organisms (taxon). The class description, as in "as in all spiders have spinnerets (silk-producing glands)" (Nico Franz, personal correspondence), is called intensional meaning, whereas the group of organisms in nature conforming with the intensional meaning is called the class extension.
We want to model both the intensional meaning (which traits do organisms belonging to a taxon have) and the extension of taxon concepts (which organisms belong to a taxon) and the extensions being organisms that are considered to be members of the class.
This necessitates the view that taxon concepts are both instances of a taxon concept class and are classes of ogranisms. Later, we will show that this means that we model Taxon Concepts with OWL Full.
OpenBiodiv taxon concepts are instances of dwc:Taxon
and vice versa ("A group of organisms [sic] considered by taxonomists to form a homogeneous unit.").
Also, taxon concepts are instances of frbr:Work
as well, but not vice versa ("A distinct intellectual or artistic creation. A work is an abstract entity; there is no single material object one can point to as the work. We recognize the work through individual realizations or expressions of the work, but the work itself exists only in the commonality of content between and among the various expressions of the work. When we speak of Homer's Iliad as a work, our point of reference is not a particular recitation or text of the work, but the intellectual creation that lies behind all the various expressions of the work.").
Furthermore, taxon concepts can also be modeled as skos:Concept
, but not vice versa ("A SKOS concept can be viewed as an idea or notion; a unit of thought. However, what constitutes a unit of thought is subjective, and this definition is meant to be suggestive, rather than restrictive.").
All three classes represent a distinctive view that we want to adopt in modeling different features of taxon concepts.
Holding the views of Berendsohn and of Franz, we require that each taxon concept is linked to both a biological name and to a work (i.e. publication, database, etc.), where the circumscription is properly defined.
<http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/Taxon> rdf:type owl:Class ; dcelements:description "Example: The genus Truncorotaloides as published by Brönnimann et al. in 1953 in the Journal of Paleontology Vol. 27(6) p. 817-820."@en ; dcelements:hasVersion <http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/history/#Taxon-2014-10-23> ; dcelements:issued "2008-11-19" ; dcelements:modified "2014-10-23" ; dcelements:replaces <http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/Taxon-2009-09-21> ; dwcattributesns:abcdEquivalence "no simple equivalent in ABCD" ; dwcattributesns:decision <http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/history/decisions/#Decision-2014-10-26_15> ; dwcattributesns:status "recommended" ; rdfs:comment "A group of organisms (sensu http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/OBI_0100026) considered by taxonomists to form a homogeneous unit."@en ; rdfs:isDefinedBy <http://rs.tdwg.org/dwc/terms/> ; rdfs:label "Taxon"@en .
:OperationalTaxonomicUnit rdf:type owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf skos:Concept, fabio:Work ; rdfs:label "Operational Taxonomic Unit"@en ; rdfs:comment "A superclass for all kinds of taxonomic hypothesis"@en .
:TaxonomicConcept rdf:type owl:Class ; owl:equivalentClass dwc:Taxon ; rdfs:subClassOf :OperationalTaxonomicUnit , [ rdf:type owl:Restriction ; owl:onProperty :taxonomicConceptLabel ; owl:minCardinality "1" ] ; rdfs:comment "A taxonomic concept in the sense of Berendsohn"@en .
Contributed property from DwC-IRI.
dwciri:scientificName rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:label "has scientific name"@en; rdfs:comment "the IRI version of dwc:scientificName"@en .
:taxonomicName rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:label "has OpenBiodiv taxonomic name"@en ; rdfs:domain :TaxonomicConcept ; rdfs:range :TaxonomicName .
:scientificName rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:subPropertyOf :taxonomicName, dwciri:scientificName ; rdfs:label "has OpeonBiodiv scientific name"@en ; rdfs:domain :TaxonomicConcept ; rdfs:range :ScientificName .
:vernacularName rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:subPropertyOf :taxonomicName ; rdfs:label "has OpenBiodiv vernacular name" @en ; rdfs:domain :TaxonomicConcept ; rdfs:range :VernacularName .
:taxonomicConceptLabel rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:subPropertyOf :scientificName ; rdfs:label "has taxon concept label"@en ; rdfs:domain :TaxonomicConcept ; rdfs:range :TaxonomicConceptLabel .
:has_OTU_Id rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:subPropertyOf :scientificName ; rdfs:label "has OTU Id"@en ; rdfs:domain :TaxonomicConcept ; rdfs:range :OTU_Id .
A class for all kinds of RCC5 term vocabularies.
:RCC5Dictionary rdf:type owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf skos:ConceptScheme , [ rdf:type owl:Restriction ; owl:onProperty fabio:isSchemeOf ; owl:allValuesFrom :RCC5Relation] ; rdfs:label "Dictionary of RCC5 Relations"@en .
:RCC5Relation rdf:type owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf skos:Concept ; rdfs:subClassOf [ rdf:type owl:Restriction ; owl:onProperty <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#inScheme> ; owl:someValuesFrom :RCC5Dictionary ] ; rdfs:label "RCC5 Relation"@en ; rdfs:comment "The of RCC 5 relation, e.g. 'partially overlaps'"@en .
:RCC5Statement rdf:type owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf ptop:Statement ; rdfs:label "RCC5 Statement" ; rdfs:comment "A statement of RCC-5 relationship" .
:rcc5Property rdf:Type owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:domain :RCC5Statement .
:rcc5fromRegion rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:subPropertyOf :rcc5Property ; rdfs:label "from region" ; rdfs:comment "Connects to the RCC5 statement to the originating region"@en .
:rcc5toRegion rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:label "to region" ; rdfs:subPropertyOf :rcc5Property ; rdfs:comment "Connects to the RCC5 statement to the target region"@en .
:rcc5RelationType rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:label "relation type" ; rdfs:subPropertyOf :rcc5Property ; rdfs:range :RCC5Relation ; rdfs:comment "Connects an RCC-5 statement to the type of RCC-5 relation between the regions."@en .
:rcc5AccrodingTo rdf:type owl:ObjectProperty ; rdfs:subPropertyOf :rcc5Property ; rdfs:label "RCC5 statement according to" ; rdfs:range frbr:Expression ; rdfs:comment "In which publication was the statement made"@en .
In order to model complex RCC-5 statements such as those made inJansen & Franz 2015 we use the above defitions and the RCC5 Vocabulary described in the Appendix.
Taxonomic name usages (TNU's) in taxonomic articles may be accompanied by strings such as "new. comb.", "new syn.", "new record for Cuba", and many others. These postfixes to a taxonomic name usage are called in our model taxonomic statuses and have taxonomic as well nomenclatural meaning. For example, if we are describing a species new to science, we may write "n. sp." after the species name, e.g. "Heser stoeviDeltchev sp. n." This particular example is also a nomenclatural act in the sense of the Codes of zoological or botanical nomenclature.
Not all statuses are necessarily nomenclatural in nature. Sometimes the status is more of a note to the reader and conveys taxonomic rather than nomenclatural information. E.g. when a previously known species is recorded in a new location.
Here we take the road of modeling statuses from the bottom-up, i.e. based on their actual use in three of the most successful journals in biological systematics - ZooKeys, Biodiversity Data Journal, and PhytoKeys. We have analyzed about 4,000 articles from these journals and have come up with a vocabulary of statuses described below. The terms in this vocabulary refer to broad concepts and encompass both specific cases of botanical or zoological nomenclature as well as purely taxonomic or informative use. We believe these concepts to be adequately granular for the purposes of reasoning in OpenBiodiv (see the paragraphs on rules in biological names.
The first step we took in creating this vocabulary is to extract the actual real-world taxonomic statuses as found almost 4,000 Pensoft articles. The script to achieve this is found under mine_tnu.R. The output of the script is a list of taxonomic status abbreviations as a text file,taxonomic_statuses.txt, in total 253 distinct usages.
The second step we took is to normalize these statuses manually: clean up parts of abbreviations that are not part of the status (such as particular taxon names) or remove irrelevant statuses (such as geological information).
After cleaning up the usages we came up with the terms in the next section and assigned each of remaining status abbreviations to one of the terms. The assignments can be seen in text files with correspondning names.
For a similar attempt, seehttp://rs.gbif.org/vocabulary/gbif/taxonomic_status.xml. We do map our statuses to the GBIF statuses to the best of our knowledge but we have more statuses.
:TaxonomicStatusDictionary rdf:type owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#ConceptScheme> , [ rdf:type owl:Restriction ; owl:onProperty fabio:isSchemeOf ; owl:allValuesFrom :TaxonomicStatus] ; rdfs:label "Dictionary of Taxonomic Statuses" ; fabio:hasDiscipline <http://dbpedia.org/page/Taxonomy_(biology)> .
:TaxonomicStatus rdf:type owl:Class ; rdfs:subClassOf skos:Concept ; rdfs:subClassOf [ rdf:type owl:Restriction ; owl:onProperty <http://www.w3.org/2004/02/skos/core#inScheme> ; owl:someValuesFrom :TaxonomicStatusDictionary ] ; rdfs:label "Taxonomic Status Term"@en ; rdfs:comment "The status following a taxonomic name usage in a taxonomic manuscript, i.e. 'n. sp.', 'comb. new', 'sec. Franz (2017)', etc"@en .